Unlock Student Success: Two Paths to Building Emotional Intelligence in Your Classroom

Emotional intelligence (EI) isn't just about understanding your feelings; it's also about navigating the emotional landscape of others. It plays a crucial role in shaping our success and overall well-being, making it a key concept in psychology.  Cobb and Mayer (2000) identified two potential approaches for teaching EI in schools. However, they emphasize that any chosen method should be:

  • Supported by evidence: backed by research demonstrating its effectiveness in boosting EI.

  • Measurable: allowing clear assessment of progress and impact.

  • Actionable: providing practical tools and strategies that teachers can readily use in classrooms.

By implementing these principles, schools can empower students to develop their EI, unlocking a pathway to personal and academic success. Understanding emotions and their impact is crucial for both personal and academic success. That's why researchers have explored different ways to teach emotional intelligence (EI) in schools.

There are Two Paths to Developing Emotional Intelligence in Schools

  • The ability model: This focuses on specific skills like perceiving, utilizing, understanding, and managing emotions. By honing these skills, students can improve their thinking and decision-making.

  • The mixed model: This broader approach incorporates emotional intelligence skills alongside social skills, personality traits, and behaviors. Proponents argue this combination leads to greater success in life.

Cobb and Mayer evaluated how these models have been applied in schools and measured. They suggest that the ability model, with its emphasis on understanding and utilizing emotions, might be more effective for reaching a wider range of students.

Measuring Emotional Intelligence:

The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) offers a tool for objectively assessing different aspects of EI. Unlike subjective self-evaluations, it uses real-life scenarios to measure how well individuals perform tasks and solve emotional problems. This provides valuable data for tracking progress and evaluating the effectiveness of EI programs in K12 schools. In 1995, Daniel's publication "Emotional Intelligence" sparked a renewed interest in this concept, highlighting its importance beyond traditional IQ (cognitive intelligence) (Cobb & Mayer, 2000). He defined emotional intelligence as a combination of skills and personality traits like determination, enthusiasm, and good behavior, emphasizing self-awareness and understanding emotions.

This idea resonated with many, as it suggested that emotional intelligence could complement IQ, potentially helping students who struggled in traditional tests. It also offered teachers a chance to foster a holistic learning environment by nurturing both the mind and heart. By developing emotional skills, schools could cultivate kind and respectful communities where students feel connected. For educators seeking curriculum options, particularly for younger students, the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) offers a wealth of resources. Despite popular perceptions fueled by media reports, the science and research behind SEL are still evolving. While interest in SEL has surged nationally since the mid-1990s, identifying firmly established school practices with strong research backing can be difficult. Though gaining traction in education, SEL has been particularly embraced by the business world. Therefore, educators should approach SEL theories with cautious optimism, considering their potential usefulness in the classroom while acknowledging the limited research currently available.

What is the value of Emotional Intelligence?

Emotional intelligence remains a significant concept, far beyond simply organizing research. It has served as a powerful lens through which we understand and explore the impact of emotions on our lives. By highlighting an "essential set of abilities," it emphasizes the crucial role emotions play in navigating personal, social, and professional landscapes. This awareness empowers individuals and institutions to cultivate these abilities, ultimately contributing to well-being, adaptability, and success.

 References

 Cobb, C. D., & Mayer, J. D. (2000). Emotional intelligence: What the research says. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 14–18.

 Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Users Manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.

 Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.

 

Teacher Support, Professional DevelopmentEducational Innovation 360Educational Innovation 360Educational innovation 360, emotional intelligence, EI, social-emotional learning, SEL, education, teachers, students, teaching methods, curriculum, assessment, research, success, well-being, psychology, models, ability model, mixed model, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, MSCEIT, CASEL, character, self-awareness, empathy, decision-making, communication, social skills